Claim 16 of 22
Rent or buy: buying a home builds more wealth than renting
Does buying a home build more wealth than renting?
Verdict
Not established
Owners hold far more wealth than renters in the US, Great Britain and Australia, and a long-run study of 16 economies finds that housing returned about as much as shares with less variation, yet the gap can reflect who becomes an owner as well as what ownership does (inference by this audit). In this audit's example, buying came out ahead only when price growth passed a threshold (0.89 to 3.54 per cent a year at a rent of 5 per cent of the price) that differs by country and by the rent paid, and the primary studies reach different conclusions for different periods, which leaves this claim, like gold's, with its test unfinished.
The cost, from the book's own figures. At 2 per cent a year price growth the owner finishes 10 years behind the renter by $68,711 in the US and A$90,597 in Australia, and ahead by £34,258 in the UK, so taking the claim as stated hides a result that turns on price growth, rent and the mortgage rate.
Made by: Bach, Pape. Argued against by: Kiyosaki.
Test it on your own numbers
- United States: CFPB, Buying a house (consumerfinance.gov/owning-a-home), to read the Loan Estimate and Closing Disclosure explainers before comparing offers.
- United Kingdom: GOV.UK, Stamp Duty Land Tax calculator (tax.service.gov.uk/calculate-stamp-duty-land-tax/#/intro), to work out the tax due on a purchase price.
- Australia: Revenue NSW, calculate transfer duty (revenue.nsw.gov.au/taxes-duties-levies-royalties/transfer-duty/understanding-transfer-duty/calculate-transfer-duty), to work out NSW transfer duty on a purchase price.
The full test, with every figure dated and sourced, is in chapter 16 of the book.